Suits over unfunded loans have legal precedent

In 2004 a jury told Ameriquest Mortgage Co. to pay more than $1.5 million to an Arizona couple who lost their home to foreclosure by another lender because, they claim, Ameriquest didn’t fund a loan that was already closed. The borrower forgot to disclose outstanding judgments and unpaid child support on his application which were subsequently uncovered. The jury said discovery Ameriquest’s responsibility.

Whether contracts have changed since 2004 to prevent such lawsuits depends on each individual lender. Some contracts today specify binding arbitration which, although available to everyone, might have been too costly and too time consuming to help the Arizona couple.

 

Suits over unfunded loans have legal precedent

Hi, I'm Jen and I'm here to help. Submit your complaint here or get help here

This article, Suits over unfunded loans have legal precedent, is just one of our articles from our Mortgage Crisis Daily

The Subprime Mortgage Crisis Before, During, and After

Mortgage Crisis Daily monitors banking problems and customer complaints and has done so since 1999. Writers hold no stock positions. Some material is used under the fair use copyright act.

We use Thomson Reuters News Service Calais in all production material but are not associated with Thomson Reuters, banks, or financial institutions in any way.